A child only gets one chance to secure a good educational foundation. When a child enters kindergarten or the first grade, parents should expect the best educational options to fit their needs.
In the United States, this historically meant that more affluent families could decide whether to send their children to public schools or to private or parochial schools as an alternative. But many families simply can’t afford the option of a private school because it would mean paying for education twice. They support public schools through taxes and can’t afford to pay a second time for private school tuition.
School choice helps level the playing field. Whether through vouchers, education savings accounts, or refundable education tax credits, school choice allows the money to “follow the child” to the best education opportunities. The short-term effects are obvious. Parents disappointed by their public schools can opt for private or homeschool education and not have to pay extra. Students can get the best education, for no extra cost to the family.
The long-term effects are even better. Because the money follows the child, new and expanded private school opportunities will materialize, homeschool resources will improve, and the competition will incentivize public schools toward excellence and efficiency. Teachers will also see better opportunities and competitive pay for their good work.
As Idaho contemplates school choice in the 2025 legislative session, decision-makers should take care to make sure Idaho does it right. School choice is an important policy and it needs to be efficient and effective. Idaho deserves the best school choice, and the good news is that we can look to other states to see what works and what doesn’t.
A “Gold Standard,” for school choice should be:
Sufficient. The program should provide enough money for families to support the cost of private education. The state funding of K-12 per pupil is projected to be about $9,700 per student in Fiscal Year 2025, and $13,000 when including local and federal sources. Idaho should target about $9000 per student — about 90% of the state cost — to account for the lower overhead of private education.
Universal. School choice should not be limited to a certain number of students, but available to all eligible students. Providing tax credits or education savings accounts to designated groups based on arbitrary criteria, like income thresholds, wrongly assumes the state can appropriately make those decisions.
Transparent. A mechanism to ensure funds go to educational expenses is reasonable. Broad latitude must be given to parents to determine the use of funds.
Deregulated. The state should not impose licensing and testing requirements on teachers, institutions, and parents — such as requiring a certificate to teach at a micro-school. There must be separation between the State Department of Education and recipients to prevent co-opting private institutions with the government model. The state must not impose its value system on private schools.
It’s time for Idaho to step up and join the many states that offer generous and robust school choice options to students; the kids who represent Idaho’s future. 2025 is the year that Idaho can be the gold standard for school choice in America.