Available Soon: Request your printed copies of the Idaho Freedom Index mailed to you!
Request Your Copies

House Bill 63 — Vaccinations, forced, mandates

House Bill 63 — Vaccinations, forced, mandates

Parrish Miller
February 1, 2021

Bill Description: House Bill 63 protects individuals from forced vaccinations, vaccination mandates, and being isolated or quarantined based on one's vaccination status. 

Rating: +3

Does it violate the spirit or the letter of either the U.S. Constitution or the Idaho Constitution? Examples include restrictions on speech, public assembly, the press, privacy, private property, or firearms. Conversely, does it restore or uphold the protections guaranteed in the U.S. Constitution or the Idaho Constitution?

House Bill 63 creates Section 39-4806, Idaho Code, to establish several important protections for individuals when it comes to vaccinations. The bill goes further and provides that no state of emergency or other such situation can be used as a pretext to bypass these protections. 

The bill strictly prohibits the state and subdivisions of the state from mandating or requiring vaccination of any person. 


It prohibits the state and subdivisions of the state from issuing orders of isolation and quarantine "based solely or primarily upon the vaccination status of any person."


It prohibits the actual administration of a vaccine to any person without that individual’s consent or, when applicable, the consent of the relevant parent or legal guardian.


View Comments
  • KVUrquidi says:

    Is a biologic a vaccine? Could private business mandate customer/employee vaccinations?

    • MadeInIdaho says:

      How many people are actually being forced to take a vaccine? I bet ZERO. I think it would be great to see the data. But If this keeps abortion legal I am for it. Hands off my body.

      • Concernedcitizen says:

        Required? None yet, the "vaccines" still only have emergency use authorization as they are in phase 3, soon to be phase 4 trials. To coerce or force people to take these vaccines is unethical and the antitheses of medical informed consent and free will/autonomy.

      • Taylor Welsh says:

        As of January 28th 2022 I have been informed by T-Mobile, my employer of 7 years that I am to either be vaccinated or be terminated, that religious and medical exemption is to the discretion of the "reviewer" in recent months , they increased start pay by $5 , require new employees to be vaccinated, and will not allow internal promotions unless vaccinated. It is real its happening and its tragic

  • ConcernedCitizen says:

    This is very important legislation as employers in the state are already coercing their employees to get vaccinated by creating medical apartheid in the form of "I've been vaccinated" badges worn "willingly" by those vaccinated. Those who don't wear the badges (unvaccinated or those who don't identify themselves as vaccinated) must wear a mask continuously and the vaccinated must also wear a mask in their presence. This is happening at employers getting state and federal funding and it must stop immediately.

    • Ksnook says:

      My husband's employer is identifying vaccinated persons with a blue name tag. So those how don't have that tag are having their status displayed. Segregation and hostility in the workplace. Lowkey way to force the hold outs. But all for the greater good right? The Vaccine is still only released for emergency use. Not even approved as safe by the fda.

  • Idaho Freedom Foundation
    802 W. Bannock Street, Suite 405, Boise, Idaho 83702
    p 208.258.2280 | e [email protected]
    COPYRIGHT © 2022 Idaho freedom Foundation
    linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram