Available Soon: Request your printed copies of the Idaho Freedom Index mailed to you!
Request Your Copies
Note to Dustin: This is currently only visible to logged in users for testing.
Click Me!

School Board Candidates

Candidate District

Candidate District

Candidate Zone

Candidate Zone

Search by Name

Search by Name

Tracey Pearson

Tracey Pearson

View Positions

Tracey Pearson

District:
Nampa School District
Zone:
Zone 3
Print

Candidate Responses

What do you believe is the fundamental role of education?
I believe the fundamental role of education is to equip students with the skills, knowledge, experience, lessons, and guidance that prepare and equip the student for life, with emphasis on personal responsibility, self- discipline, and academic excellence. These are primarily to support and develop the greatest potential inside every learner regardless of age, color, gender, or economic status, guiding students to become positive, contributing citizens into their family and their community. Students should be excited for a bright and successful future.
How would you promote rigorous academic instruction and excellence in your school district?
The promotion of rigorous academic instruction and excellence in a school district requires unity between the child, parent, teacher and school leadership. This comes through building transparency and respectful communication between each of these individuals, recognizing that the ultimate responsibility and authority belongs to the parent.
How do you define Critical Race Theory? When implemented in school policies and curriculum, do you think Critical Race Theory differs from simply “teaching history?”
Critical Race Theory ignores and denies the divine inspiration and bright light born in us all. CRT defines each person’s character by the color of their skin. This theory declares false truths to be factual. This ideology misguides innocent minds who don’t see color. CRT teaches that we are not equal. To teach children and young adults that they are going to face oppression or become an oppressor in their lifetime because of their skin color promotes hate, division, and victimism. CRT neglects to recognize one of the most important lessons to teach a young mind: personal responsibility and all are created equal. To teach these falsehoods of character is destructive to our society.
How do you define Social Emotional Learning (SEL)? Would you encourage the implementation of any SEL model in your school district? If so, which model and why?
I Define Social Emotional Learning as the government's idea of your child’s healthy identity and mental wellness. Proponents of SEL call for focusing less on academic content and knowledge in schools, and more emphasis on student attributes, mindsets, values, and behavior. SEL teaches your child a narrow view of what values should be held. The goal of SEL is to impose the definition of a child's identity, goals, how to feel, show empathy, manage emotions, and how to make decisions based on an SEL educator’s viewpoint. These programs are designed to form attitudes, values, and beliefs based on government ideology. Social emotional learning disregards, replaces, and devalues the responsibility and paramount importance that the family has in regard to these values a child is taught. We must recognize the significance of each family's unique values and not give these vital lessons over to the government. I would propose that educators refocus their efforts in teaching genuine academic achievements. These programs rob the teachers and students of valuable time and focus, needed for academic success. I would not implement the SEL model in my school district.
How would you respond to the Idaho State Board and Department of Education’s recent dissemination of resources such as the SEL Roadmap for Reopening Schools, which argues that schools should adopt anti-racist practices, focus on social justice, and conduct staff-wide implicit bias trainings? Should teachers be required to attend these kinds of trainings?
My response to the Idaho’s State Board and Department of Education’s recent dissemination of resources such as SEL Roadmap for reopening schools, anti-racist practices, social justice, and statewide implicit bias training. No, teachers should not be required to attend these training sessions. Teachers should have a choice. I believe these programs magnify, overemphasize, and create negative narratives. They cultivate confusion, division, stress, and weigh down a child's learning experiences. These programs stray away from the healthy intended goal of the educational system. I believe this is the government creating exaggerated problems to make policies that only hinder students' from being given the optimal education they need to become self-reliant, self-disciplined, prepared, happy students, excited for their futures. I believe the role of government should be to provide students and their families the freedom to empower themselves, and pursue their own goals, and solve their own problems.
Should your school district be required to teach a sex education curriculum? If so, should this curriculum include instruction on sexual orientation and gender identity? Should parents and guardians be required to provide consent before their children participate in any sex education curriculum?
I believe no form of sexual education, sexual orientation, or gender identity should be taught without the consent of the parent or guardian. If a teacher has not received consent, the student should not be in these classes. Furthermore, I believe we must follow science, not feelings or the personal beliefs of a scientist. There are only two genders, male and female. These theories, beliefs, feelings only create confusion, frustration, and mental tension. These curriculums hinder learning skills to prepare and equip students for a successful life.
How should school districts respond to the Idaho School Boards Association’s recommendation that transgender students be allowed to use the bathroom of the gender with which they identify?
No, I do not support transgender to be allowed in bathroom of their choice. To allow a person of opposite sex to enter the bathroom of which they feel their gender to be, would be to deprive students their privacy and safety. The adults who assume responsibility to protect students while at school and allow such acts, would subject these students to harm and no protection. We must follow the science, not the feelings or confusion of the minority. We must recognize the danger of allowing a male to enter an area that has a female in a extremely vulnerable place and at high risk of sexual abuse.
Do you support mask mandates in schools as a COVID-19 mitigation strategy? Do you support implementation of any other policies or practices designed to mitigate the effects of COVID-19?
No, I do not support mask mandates. I support freedom of choice. I believe it is important to teach and pursue a healthy strong immune system.

Jeff Kirkman

Jeff Kirkman

View Positions

Jeff Kirkman

District:
Nampa School District
Zone:
Zone 5
Print

Candidate Responses

What do you believe is the fundamental role of education?
The fundamental role of education is to teach academics to students K-12 that further an individual's intellect, knowledge, and critical thinking skills that will be invaluable as they mature and grow into adulthood. Additionally, it should support societal norms and values without discounting unfamiliar concepts and ideas. This is a reason why school boards have local control is to be more representative of local communities.
How would you promote rigorous academic instruction and excellence in your school district?
Rigorous academic instruction in the Nampa school district can be realized if we let teachers teach. There is a reason these unsung heroes got into the business of teaching, to teach our children necessary academic knowledge and skills and instill a love for life-long learning. They certainly didn’t get in the business for the money so why does the state, school district administrations, and school boards seem to make it so difficult to achieve this primary purpose? Instead of mandating numerous changes in curriculum, standards, testing and assessments, etc., which every time the next “big thing” comes along they have to spend time and money getting trained, practicing, and explaining it to confused parents and students, teachers should have the obstacles removed so they can just teach. We need to focus on what is working and make it better rather than shifting to a different direction much too often. A critical review of curriculum, texts, and other instructional materials and methods by the board, administrations, teachers, parents, and even students themselves will also lend itself to rigorous and excellent instruction.
How do you define Critical Race Theory? When implemented in school policies and curriculum, do you think Critical Race Theory differs from simply “teaching history?”
CRT is a theory – not proven, not fact – but a theory that attempts to relegate people of color to the bottom tier of society due to the assertion that there is systemic, institutional racism and attempts to identify ”whiteness” as evil and the white race as oppressors. Of course it differs from “teaching history” because it is not history. There are periods in our history when there was, and still is today, racism and it is ugly and hurtful, demeaning and demoralizing to everyone. The bad parts of our history should be taught with the good parts of our history but without the context of trying to teach our impressionable young kids that one race, white, are the oppressors over another race, black, who are the victims and the oppressed. How can we ever grow and be better when this is being taught in many different ways than just straight from a curriculum which is illegal in Idaho? We should simply be teaching our students that it doesn’t matter what race someone is, they deserve to be treated equally and with respect. No reason to indoctrinate them with suppositions that there are oppressors and oppressed. That simply perpetuates division.
How do you define Social Emotional Learning (SEL)? Would you encourage the implementation of any SEL model in your school district? If so, which model and why?
Simply put, SEL is teaching kids how to think and feel. There are measurables when teaching academics to students and testing and other assessments work well to determine if a student has learned the information or not. But how do you measure how someone, especially kids, thinks and feels and if they meet whatever standard might be in place? Teachers are not counselors and SEL curriculum belongs in that area, not the classroom. Schools should not be teaching any model of SEL. Leave it to the parents and those specifically and professionally trained, and I don’t mean a couple of days of in-service training, to address issues with social and emotional learning.
How would you respond to the Idaho State Board and Department of Education’s recent dissemination of resources such as the SEL Roadmap for Reopening Schools, which argues that schools should adopt anti-racist practices, focus on social justice, and conduct staff-wide implicit bias trainings? Should teachers be required to attend these kinds of trainings?
My response would be to vigorously oppose the dissemination of these types of resources. Why are schools hyper-focused on social justice issues? Teachers don’t have enough time to teach the fundamental academics let alone the time needed to attend training for anti-racist, implicit bias, and social justice issues. We are missing the mark if we start requiring teachers to attend these trainings. Leave it open as an option for continuing education that they seek on their own time if they so choose.
Should your school district be required to teach a sex education curriculum? If so, should this curriculum include instruction on sexual orientation and gender identity? Should parents and guardians be required to provide consent before their children participate in any sex education curriculum?
The Nampa school district should not be required to teach sex education curriculum except for the basic biology of the function of the human body which really isn’t sex education, it is simply science and biology about how bodies work. Leave the sex education out of the school and home with the parents. I understand that not all students have parents or an environment where they will learn such important facts of life so if a sex education class is provided at school, it must be by consent of the parent/guardian and not an opt-out situation but an opt-in requirement. My concern about sex education being taught in our schools is parents don’t know the agenda a teacher may have when teaching it. Is the instruction going to include pronoun preferences, LGBTQI issues, unisex bathrooms, deviant behavior, literature that may be deemed obscene by community standards, and abortion? These are deeply personal issues that should be dealt with on a personal level between the parent/guardian and the child, not the school. I will not stand by and let the schools usurp the rights of parents to teach their children about these sensitive issues but if they decide they want to opt-in their child to be taught sex education beyond the biology, then I support their right to make that decision.
How should school districts respond to the Idaho School Boards Association’s recommendation that transgender students be allowed to use the bathroom of the gender with which they identify?
I will respond to the ISBA’s recommendation with absolute defiance. There must never be a male student in a female bathroom and vice-versa. Simply identifying as a sex does not change biology. Designate a bathroom for those who identify as either gender to use will mitigate this concern and remain equitable for students.
Do you support mask mandates in schools as a COVID-19 mitigation strategy? Do you support implementation of any other policies or practices designed to mitigate the effects of COVID-19?
I am opposed to mask mandates and vaccination mandates. Parents must retain the right to make those decisions for their children and not schools or other government entities. I support any individual’s decision to wear a mask and get vaccinated but not to force anyone else to do so. The COVID vaccinations are much different than MMR and other diseases for which kids are vaccinated. Those vaccines have been proven to work over many, many years so it is not comparing apples to apples. The simple basics of enhanced cleaning, disinfecting, social distancing when appropriate, hand washing, and staying home when sick are the most effective strategies at mitigating the spread of COVID and other viruses like the flu.
Note: As a 501(c)(3) organization, IFF does not endorse or oppose any candidate for public office. Candidates’ responses are provided solely for educational purposes.

Not sure where to vote? Look up your polling location here.

View Polling Location
Idaho Freedom Foundation
802 W. Bannock Street, Suite 405, Boise, Idaho 83702
p 208.258.2280 | e Media@IdahoFreedom.org
COPYRIGHT © 2022 Idaho freedom Foundation
magnifiercrossmenucross-circle
>
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram